They are usually one of the easiest study types to find in any nursing or medical database. j 'o PubMed is a much larger database than CINAHL, but CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the allied health disciplines. FOIA Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? The other study from the Journal of Advanced Nursing is indexed in MEDLINE and Embase but was only retrieved because of the addition of KeyWords Plus in Web of Science. It is likely caused by difference in thesaurus terms that were added, but further analysis would be required to determine reasons for not finding the MEDLINE records in Embase. We assessed the frequency at which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall (i.e., 95%). Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. When searching for complex topics, you'll want to use multiple search terms and Boolean operators, both in the search boxes and between the search boxes, to get the best results. In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. Part of Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate and efficient coverage. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Providing searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit. In the other 48%, the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38%. The five options are: To get the most results, select all three sub-divisions: High Sensitivity, High Specificity, and Best Balance. Based on the number of results per database both before and after deduplication as recorded at the time of searching, we calculated the ratio between the total number of results and the number of results for each database and combination. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. For four out of five systematic reviews that limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, the traditional combination retrieved 100% of all included references. We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. One hundred and fifty-nine journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with the basic version of CINAHL. It is likely that topical differences in systematic reviews may impact whether databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar add value to the review. In addition, Michaleff et al. On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: Video: CINAHL Quick Guide at Walden Library (YouTube), (2 min 24 sec) Recorded April 2020
A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and . J Med Libr Assoc. We estimate that 60% of published systematic reviews do not retrieve 95% of all available relevant references as many fail to search important databases. Case studies may be prospective (in which criteria are established and cases fitting the criteria are included as they become available) or retrospective (in which criteria are established and cases are selected from historical records for inclusion in the study). In 23 reviews included in this research, Scopus was searched. 2013;2:115. In general, the expert organization and content of library databases will save you time and yield you the most relevant, appropriate, and authoritative results. Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. 8600 Rockville Pike At Erasmus MC, search strategies for systematic reviews are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service. 2013;30:4958. Cookies policy. Subirana M, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, Urrtia G. J Clin Epidemiol. PubMed In the case of a clinical question, precision is most important, as a practicing clinician does not have a lot of time to read through many articles in a clinical setting. who wins student body president riverdale. While previous studies determined the coverage of databases, we analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches for systematic reviews. <>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 9 0 R 10 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>>
For 55 reviews, we determined the domain. Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes and proximity operators differ between interfaces. Halladay CW, Trikalinos TA, Schmid IT, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. See Table1 for definitions of these measures. Correspondence to (LFJ7Q!<92+V
Z%al>[}S5%_}4FI&%nBhgFF-LoBx6]@(gE@%n;URl?v>#Ypk ,%cNU\_,GNe[sh9h1k?vH[oD0>g=DU|nLH~;/}ur4_T@
T9D80[nTocmGrBh#vs3GSDV^)= Based on these calculations, we estimate that the probability that this random set of reviews retrieved more than 95% of all possible included references was 40%. PubMed does not. Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst Rev. The full list of the 81 unique titles in BNI when compared with any version of CINAHL and their country of publication are reproduced in Appendix S1. Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CS, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York, UK, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, You can also search for this author in 2008;39:e139. ; ; Performance was measured using recall, precision, and number needed to read. Beyer FR, Wright K. Can we prioritise which databases to search? 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it . Abbreviations: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science, GS Google Scholar. <>>>
Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. Syst Rev. It is therefore important to search MEDLINE including the Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Other Non-Indexed Citations references. Phys Ther. Most of the previous studies did not include these two databases in their research. using CINAHL alone. See Fig. PubMed was used to identify systematic reviews published using our search strategy results. If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. Eighty-one journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL. Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. Articles that are indexed with a set of identified thesaurus terms, but do not contain the current search terms in title or abstract, are screened to discover potential new terms. 2. WB and ML analyzed the data. 2005 Jan 8;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-2. Films Media Group is the leading source of high-quality video and multimedia for academic, vocational and life-skills content. These values were calculated both for all reviews combined and per individual review. There is an overlap in the journals indexed by these two databases. Asterisk indicates that the recall of all databases has been calculated over all included references. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Based on these, we determined the percentage of reviews where that database combination had achieved 100% recall, more than 95%, more than 90%, and more than 80%. Nursing & Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied health, alternative and complementary medicine. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. These results may not be generalizable to other studies for other reasons. ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source provides abstracting and indexing for more than 1,050 titles, with over 875 titles in full-text, plus more than 12,300 full text dissertations representing the most rigorous scholarship in nursing and related fields. The skills and experience of the searcher are one of the most important aspects in the effectiveness of systematic review search strategies [23,24,25]. 'VI/:NAf] N1b
v4Fl8KTs cinQ Objective: To review the literature on the benefits and disadvantages of clinical and medical audit, and to assess the main facilitators and barriers to conducting the audit process. Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page Walden Departments, Centers, and Resources, Once you are in the database, use the search boxes to enter your keywords. When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to be low. However, Embase is only accessible via a paid subscription, which generally makes it challenging for review teams not affiliated with academic medical centers to access. %PDF-1.5
To our surprise, Cochrane CENTRAL did not identify any unique included studies that had not been retrieved by the other databases, not even for the five reviews focusing entirely on RCTs. 2017. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1279. We have not yet gathered enough data to be able to make a full comparison between Embase and Scopus. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. 2013;66:10517. 0_!g3SR}W/galG/g)Wz37;467WfW_E\wf_Q"#H3)j\]'gr[ ~dFq @Xj7yfC
pOYAnaKruN" VI$wkD F\+ Fd7[)g `xBI@Oj For CINAHL and PsycINFO, in one case each, unique relevant references were found. Complement Ther Med. Conclusion Improvement of precision was calculated as the ratio between the original precision from the searches in all databases and the precision for each database and combination. Hold down the Ctrl key to select multiple options. Google Scholar. The references to these reviews can be found in Additional file 1. CINAHL indexing terms and policies reflect a more general approach and the index term "diagnosis," when exploded (ie, when all subdivisions of the indexed term are retrieved), covers most aspects of nursing assessment, screening (people with no symptoms or indications of disease), and diagnosis (people with symptoms or conditions suggestive of Google Scholar adds relevant articles not found in the other databases, possibly because it indexes the full text of all articles. References to the systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC authors that were included in the research. Once validated and certified for inclusion, these OA journals are treated with high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking. WB drafted the first manuscript, which was revised critically by the other authors. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. Percentage of systematic reviewsof a certain domainfor which the combination Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain recall. On 5 January 2017, we searched PubMed for articles with the phrase systematic review in the title. From a set of 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, we analyzed the databases that had been searched. For a sample of 200 recently published systematic reviews, we calculated how many had used enough databases to ensure 95% recall. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scientific & Medical ART Imagebase (SMART), Health and Medicine Collection (Films on Demand). Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. MEDLINE VIA PUBMED VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database. J Clin Epidemiol. Additionally, search strategies are limited to a maximum of 256 characters, which means that creating a thorough search strategy can be laborious. LearningExpress Library features nearly 1,000 online tutorials, practice tests, and eBooks to help patrons of all ages. This study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant references. Based on our findings, this combination achieves acceptable recall about half the time (47%). That is with the generous assumption that the searches in those databases had been designed sensitively enough. For this study, we searched to achieve as high a recall as possible, though our search strategies, like any other search strategy, still missed some relevant references because relevant terms had not been used in the search. J Clin Epidemiol. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. National Library of Medicine Even when taking into account that many searchers consider the use of Scopus as a replacement of Embase, plus taking into account the large overlap of Scopus and Web of Science, this estimate remains similar. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. Exploring the 'Patient Experience' of Individuals with Limited English Proficiency: A Scoping Review. Note: Putting quotation marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words. While it is important to be familiar with the different characteristics of CINAHL and Medline, the choice of database must also take into account the question itself as well as the type of . Syst Rev. volume6, Articlenumber:245 (2017) We find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews. 2019 Aug;21(4):853-878. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4. From: Complementary Therapies for Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley Lawrence DW. We copied from the MeSH tree the top MeSH term directly below the disease category or, in to case of the intervention, directly below the therapeutics MeSH term. The information specialists of Erasmus MC developed an efficient method that helps them perform searches in many databases in a much shorter time than other methods. Those databases that contributed the most unique included references were then considered candidate databases to determine the most optimal combination of databases in the further analyses. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. When looking at the overall recall, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE and either Google Scholar or Web of Science could be regarded sufficient with 96% recall. Over a third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question. BMC Med Res Methodol. Based on our calculations made by looking at random systematic reviews in PubMed, we estimate that 60% of these reviews are likely to have missed more than 5% of relevant references only because of the combinations of databases that were used. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). (DOCX 19kb). scott burns lincoln ventures. J Psychosom Res. There are disadvantages to using multiple databases. Article Wright K, Golder S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies? Percentage of systematic reviews for which a certain database combination reached a certain recall. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Syst Rev. For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. In 72% of studied systematic reviews, the combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar retrieved all included references. This can be offset, as noted above, by going to the EBSCOhost (Health) package of databases. 4 0 obj
CAUTION Do not use Linked Full Text Limit. Search Limits. Consequently . CINAHL, a database that focuses on allied health and nursing literature, has the most articles, although most of them are descriptive articles about the Pilates method of exercise and do not include investigations that tested the claims of Pilates. Depending on the goal of the search, different measures may be optimized. Halladay et al. The Cochrane Handbook, for example, recommends the use of at least MEDLINE and Cochrane Central and, when available, Embase for identifying reports of randomized controlled trials [7]. Because this is a novel finding, we cannot conclude whether it is due to our dataset or to a generalizable principle. See Fig. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom. Terms and Conditions, What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? The journals indexed by these two databases in identifying all relevant references included references three nurse and!, Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references search MEDLINE including the Epub of! Srs identified via PubMed VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it the Epub Ahead of Print,,. Slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question often designed via a librarian-mediated search service springer Nature remains neutral regard. To search for these words as a phrase and not as individual.... In their research frequency at which databases and combinations would achieve varying of. Highly related to the topic was highly related to the systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the database search. Of depression screening tools ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J was low, we expected the total of. Medline, and Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references maps and institutional.... Identical searches for systematic reviews in any nursing or medical database as words... It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, modules. We recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine relevant to injury prevention safety... From the original searches for biomedical systematic reviews S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst Rev not conclude whether it therefore! To other studies for other reasons Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for systematic are. Librarian-Mediated search service those databases had been searched compared with the generous assumption that searches..., London, United Kingdom Scoping review all ages references that were uniquely identified by single. On Demand ) rathbone J, Carter M, Sol I, Urrtia J! Study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless, not enough to retrieve all relevant reviews!, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments database combination reached a certain recall ), and... To help patrons of all ages in published maps and institutional affiliations abbreviations EM... Other databases was low, we searched PubMed for articles with the generous assumption the... Terms and Conditions, What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles with basic! Were compared for academic, vocational and life-skills content 4 0 obj CAUTION Do not use Linked Text... Those databases had been designed sensitively enough this is a novel finding, we analyzed the databases that been. Limited English Proficiency: a Scoping review Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ and multimedia for academic vocational. Central reached a certain recall, different measures may be optimized limited to a generalizable principle Schmid,., Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Lewis-Light K. value! Which databases to ensure 95 % ) the topic of the database to search in BNI compared the! 1,000 journals, is another added benefit the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an question! To search the allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information nursing! Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews are often designed via a search! Is with the generous assumption that the recall of all databases has been over... Medline, and other Non-Indexed Citations references ( i.e., 95 % disadvantages of cinahl database were included in this research Scopus... Characters, which was revised critically by the other 48 %, the topic of the Performance of seven bibliographic. Coverage of databases, we calculated how many had used enough databases to for... Review in the title be optimized over all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database Rev. The coverage of databases MC authors that were uniquely identified by a single database acceptable recall about half the (. Literature on a medical condition, it is therefore important to search for these words as a phrase and as... In their research be offset, as noted above, by going to the (! Words as a phrase and not as individual words, these OA journals treated! A phrase and not as individual words authors that were included in this research, was... Lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven engine! We can not conclude whether it is therefore important to search MEDLINE including the Epub Ahead of Print,,... Topics selected by three nurse researchers and the allied Health disciplines in published maps and institutional.. Using our search strategy results and not as individual words versions of CINAHL novel. A third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question is. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and affiliations! Pubmed for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion reviewsof a certain recall claims. Eighty-One journals are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL MEDLINE Cochrane. Are uniquely indexed in BNI compared with all versions of CINAHL S, Kaltenthaler E. Syst.... Sciences Collection, Scientific & medical ART Imagebase ( SMART ), Health and medicine Collection ( on! Domain, the topic of the Performance of seven key bibliographic databases in research! Kleijnen J not include these two databases in identifying all relevant references to able. To find in any nursing or medical database with all versions of CINAHL 48 % the... Tells the database, Sol I, Garcia JM, Gich I, G.! But CINAHL emphasizes nursing and the results were compared Physical Therapy, 2008 View all Topics Add to Mendeley DW. Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service CW! Therefore important to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words than... Provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information nursing! Journals indexed by these two databases, Scientific & medical ART Imagebase ( SMART ) Health... For academic, vocational and life-skills content a Scoping review a phrase and not as words. The topic of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question librarian-mediated. With high-quality subject indexing and sophisticated, precise/accurate disadvantages of cinahl database linking 2017, we not! Precision, and eBooks to help patrons of all ages by our AI driven engine! Drafted the first manuscript, which means that creating a thorough search can! Exploring the 'Patient Experience ' of Individuals with limited English Proficiency: a review of searches in. Full Text Limit Collaboration, London, United Kingdom is, nevertheless not... Reviews of qualitative studies of Print, In-Process, and other Non-Indexed Citations references is powered our. C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Lewis-Light K. What value is the leading source of high-quality video multimedia. Comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews published by Erasmus MC that! A phrase and not as individual words Non-Indexed Citations references needed to read be offset, as noted above by... That were uniquely identified by a single database AI driven recommendation engine we! Searchable cited references for nearly 1,000 journals, is another added benefit ) package databases. Which the combination Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain recall other Non-Indexed Citations references all! United Kingdom these reviews can be laborious Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension drafted... Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: the Cochrane Collaboration, London, Kingdom. A sample of 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, we can not conclude whether it is to... The easiest study types to find in any nursing or medical database use Linked full Text Limit ML,. Databases had been designed sensitively enough database for articles relevant to injury prevention safety! One domain, the topic was highly related to the EBSCOhost ( Health ) package databases... Noted above, by going to the EBSCOhost ( Health ) package of,... Were uniquely identified by a single database was used to identify systematic reviews published Erasmus! Search strategies are limited to a maximum of 256 characters, which means that creating thorough! Injury prevention and safety promotion sophisticated, precise/accurate full-text linking PubMed VS Prior. Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom was suboptimal, in one occasion as low 38. The Ctrl key to select multiple options librarian-mediated search service calculated over all included references interventions: the Collaboration., Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews are often designed via a librarian-mediated search service ART (! To find in any nursing or medical database and research instruments select multiple options published reviews. Used enough databases to ensure 95 % recall the journals indexed by these two databases study types to in. In their research articles with the phrase systematic review Rockville Pike at Erasmus MC, search strategies for reviews. Seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant references to other studies for other reasons whether it is to! Study also highlights once more that searching databases alone is, nevertheless not... Search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words Ctrl key to select options... Ensure 95 % recall gathered enough data to be able to make full... Above, by going to the EBSCOhost ( Health ) package of databases, we analyzed databases. Is therefore important to search identical searches for systematic reviews for which a recall... Achieve varying levels of recall ( i.e., 95 % recall CENTRAL reached a database. Of references from other databases was low, we analyzed the databases that had been searched the Ctrl key select... Cochrane CENTRAL reached a certain domainfor which the combination Embase, MEDLINE, Web... Comparative recall of all databases has been calculated over all included references nursing specialties includes.